Crypto Bill Fails: What It Means for Stablecoin Yield
Eleven days. Thatâs how long our ârethink your CD strategy because a hike is comingâ post lasted before the data underneath it fell apart.
On August 6, we told readers the CME FedWatch Tool was pricing roughly 82% odds of a September rate hike, driven by an Iran-war oil shock, and that locking money into a long CD no longer made sense. One day later, the Bureau of Labor Statistics released the July jobs report. It was ugly. Hike odds didnât just soften â they cratered, and they kept cratering for the next week straight. This is the correction to our own correction.
Quick Take: How Fast This Moved
Date September Hike Odds (CME FedWatch) What Happened Aug 6, 2026 ~82% Our original post; Iran oil shock driving inflation fear Jul 31, 2026 67% Already cooling before the jobs data even landed Aug 7, 2026 44.4% July jobs report: payrolls fell 23,000 Aug 12-14, 2026 ~31-40% Odds kept sliding as the miss sank in Net move: more than 40 percentage points, in about a week.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that nonfarm payrolls fell by 23,000 in July. Not slowed. Fell. Economists surveyed by the Wall Street Journal and Barronâs had penciled in gains somewhere between 85,000 and 95,000. The miss wasnât a rounding error â it landed as the third-largest monthly payroll decline since the COVID-19 pandemic, according to Motley Foolâs coverage.
It got worse the deeper you read. May and June payrolls got revised down by a combined 103,000 jobs â Mayâs gain cut from 129,000 to 63,000, Juneâs from 57,000 to 20,000. Average hourly earnings grew just 3.2% year-over-year, below both the 3.5% consensus forecast and inflation itself. Do that math and real wages went backward in July.
Fed funds futures reacted immediately. CME FedWatch showed September hike odds at 67% on July 31 â already down from the 82% we cited on August 6, since oil-driven fear had started fading even before the jobs data hit. By the close on August 7, hike odds sat at 44.4%. They didnât stop there. Trackers put the number around 31% to 40% by mid-August, depending on the exact hour and on which pricing source you pull â CME futures or Polymarketâs prediction market.
Hereâs the part that makes this genuinely hard, not just a headline flip: both signals are real.
Anthony Saglimbene, chief market strategist at Ameriprise Financial, put it plainly: âOne number is not a trend. So I wouldnât read too much into it. But a weaker employment figure might give the Fed a little bit more reason to think about the impact of potential rate hikes. Our view is that they wonât raise rates in September.â
Chris Zaccarelli at Northlight Asset Management went further, arguing the jobs miss changes the Fedâs whole calculus: âThe weak jobs report means the Fed can no longer focus exclusively on inflation. It has to balance price stability against full employment, making it much more likely to stay on hold at its next meeting.â Northlightâs read lines up with Goldman Sachs Asset Managementâs August market outlook, which expects the Fed to hold and wait for more evidence on how much of the oil shock actually passes through to consumer prices before moving.
Meanwhile, the thing that drove our August 6 post hasnât gone anywhere. Brent crude is still trading in the mid-to-high $80s a barrel, well above the $84 level we flagged two weeks ago, as the Iran conflict and Strait of Hormuz disruptions grind on. Oil-driven inflation doesnât care that payrolls came in soft. Thatâs Fed Chair Kevin Warshâs actual problem right now â not picking between hawkish and dovish, but reconciling an inflation signal that says âhikeâ with a labor signal that says âdonât you dare,â as CBS News laid out in its rundown of the September meeting stakes. Not every forecaster agrees the jobs data wins that fight, either â some, including strategists at J.P. Morgan Wealth Management, are still penciling in a September hike on the inflation side of the ledger.
Because it wasnât wrong given what was knowable on August 6. Three FOMC members had already dissented in favor of a July hike. Oil had spiked more than 38% for the year. The FedWatch odds genuinely sat near 82%. Reasoning from that data to âexpect a hike, shorten your CD termsâ wasnât a bad call â it was the correct read of an incomplete picture, the same way the original March post was a correct read of a different incomplete picture.
The lesson isnât âdonât trust FedWatch.â Itâs that FedWatch is a probability snapshot updated by whatever data landed most recently, not a forecast that holds still. Weâve now published two posts in five months walking back our own prior CD advice because a single data release moved the number by double digits. If youâre making CD decisions based on the headline odds of the week, youâre going to get whipsawed exactly like we did.
The urgency to avoid long CDs because âa hike is comingâ is gone again â for now. Odds under 40% mean a hold is now the more likely outcome at the September 16 meeting, not a lock, but the base case. Thatâs a real shift from two weeks ago.
Donât swing all the way back to âlock in longâ either. Brent crude hasnât retreated, and a ceasefire breakdown or a hot CPI print between now and September 16 could send hike odds right back toward 82% the way they got there in the first place. The set of possible outcomes hasnât narrowed as much as the headline percentage suggests.
Shorter and mid-length terms still make the most sense for new money. A 6 to 12-month CD, or a rung in a T-bill ladder, keeps you close enough to the actual decision that youâre not stuck holding a rate that becomes wrong either direction.
If you already locked a rate off our August post, youâre still fine. Good CD rates are still running roughly 3.95% to 4.50% depending on term, and a rate you locked two weeks ago is paying exactly what it said it would pay regardless of which way FedWatch odds move next. Locking a rate isnât a bet on being right about the Fed. Itâs a bet on a number you already know.
Cash you might need before September 16 belongs in something that can move with the data, not against it. A high-yield savings account doesnât lock you into either outcome â it just pays whatever the prevailing rate is while you wait for the meeting to actually happen.
Donât take our August 6 number, or this one, as gospel three weeks from now. Hereâs how to check it in under a minute:
Our August 6 post wasnât wrong when we wrote it â the data available at the time genuinely supported the read. It just didnât survive contact with one jobs report. September hike odds went from 82% to 67% to 44.4% to somewhere in the 31-40% range in the space of about a week, which tells you less about where rates are headed and more about how little any single weekâs forecast is worth trusting on its own.
If youâre sitting on cash waiting to decide, the honest answer hasnât actually changed between our two posts: stay shorter than youâd normally want to, because the range of outcomes is still wide, and check the actual odds yourself before acting on anyoneâs August headline â including ours.
July 2026 jobs report data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, released August 7, 2026. Fed funds futures odds from CNBCâs coverage of CME FedWatch data and Motley Foolâs August 12 analysis. Analyst quotes from Reuters, via Yahoo Finance. Goldman Sachs Asset Management outlook from its August 2026 Market Pulse. Fed dilemma context from CBS News. Odds and rates are current as of mid-August 2026 and can move quickly â verify before acting. This isnât financial advice.