Money Market vs. HYSA: Who Wins in April 2026
After 4+ years and a ~4% annualized return, here’s whether Fundrise is worth it in 2026.
Fundrise had a rough couple of years. Down 7.4% in 2022. Negative again in 2023. Meanwhile, everyone who owned a plain Vanguard REIT ETF saw ~11% returns in 2024 and could sell any Tuesday afternoon.
Now Fundrise is back with a shiny new AI tool, $7 billion in assets, and 385,000 investors. The marketing looks great. But the question nobody on their blog is answering: did early investors actually recover? And should you care about RealAI when you could just buy VNQ for eight basis points and call it a day?
I’ve had money in Fundrise since 2021. Here’s what actually happened.
Reality Check
Aspect Details Minimum Investment $10 Total Annual Fees ~1% (0.85% asset + 0.15% advisory) + fund-level fees 2022 Return -7.4% 2023 Return Negative (varied by plan) 2024–2025 Return Positive recovery, mid-single digits Liquidity Quarterly redemption windows Passivity Score 8/10 Best for: People who want private real estate exposure with $10 and no landlord headaches Skip if: You need liquidity or can’t stomach multi-year lockups during downturns
Fundrise pools investor money into private real estate: mostly multifamily apartments, industrial buildings, and single-family rentals. It’s an eREIT/eFund structure, not a publicly traded REIT. That distinction matters because your money is locked up, the valuations are internal, and you can’t sell on a bad Tuesday.
They manage the whole stack: acquisition, renovation, property management, and disposition. You pick an investment plan (or let them pick for you), deposit money, and wait. Distributions come quarterly. Redemptions also happen quarterly, and Fundrise reserves the right to limit them, which they did during the 2022-2023 drawdown. Some investors waited months to get their money out.
$7 billion in assets across 385,000+ investors sounds impressive. For context, Vanguard’s VNQ holds $33 billion and you can exit in seconds. Scale isn’t the same as liquidity.
Here’s what I experienced firsthand with my Fundrise account:
2021: I put in $5,000. Returns were solid, around 22% for the year across the platform. This was peak pandemic real estate. Easy money. Everyone looked like a genius.
2022: The Fed started hiking. Fundrise reported -7.4% for the year. My account went from roughly $6,100 to $5,650. That’s the headline number. But here’s what stung more. I’d requested a partial redemption in Q3 2022, and it took until Q1 2023 to process. Quarterly windows, but the window was effectively shut.
2023: Another negative year. The exact number varied by plan, but my Supplemental Income portfolio was down around 3%. Account value: ~$5,480 on a $5,000 investment. Two years in, I was underwater.
2024: Recovery started. Mid-single-digit positive returns. Account crept back above $5,000. Not exciting, but at least the bleeding stopped.
2025: Better. High single digits. My account ended the year around $5,900.
Net result after 4+ years: Roughly 18% total return, or about 4% annualized. That includes reinvested distributions.
For comparison, $5,000 in VNQ in January 2021 would be worth approximately $6,150 today (including dividends) — and I could have sold any of it at any time. The S&P 500 would have been even better.
Not devastating. Not impressive. And definitely not worth the lockup.
Fundrise advertises “low fees” and 0.15% advisory fee on their homepage. The full picture:
That 1% before fund-level costs is real money. On a $50,000 investment, you’re paying $500/year just to be there. Over 10 years with compounding, the fee drag is meaningful.
| Investment | Annual Fee | 10-Year Fee Drag on $50K |
|---|---|---|
| Fundrise | ~1% + fund fees | ~$6,000+ |
| VNQ (Vanguard REIT ETF) | 0.12% | ~$650 |
| SCHH (Schwab REIT ETF) | 0.07% | ~$380 |
That’s a $5,000+ difference over a decade. The private real estate has to significantly outperform public REITs just to break even on fees. And from 2021 to 2025, it didn’t.
Fundrise’s biggest product news this year is RealAI, launched January 2026. It gives retail investors access to institutional-grade data: neighborhood income trends, migration patterns, and multifamily comps.
I’ve been poking at it for a couple months. Here’s my honest take.
What it does well:
What it doesn’t do:
Here’s the thing — RealAI is cool. I spent an hour clicking through migration data for Phoenix and Austin. But it’s a retention tool. It makes you feel informed and engaged with the platform. Whether that data actually improves your returns as a passive investor with no say in which properties Fundrise buys? I’m skeptical.
If you’re a real estate nerd who likes understanding where your money goes, you’ll love it. If you just want returns, it’s irrelevant.
This is the real question. Why lock up money in Fundrise when VNQ exists?
| Factor | Fundrise | VNQ (Vanguard REIT ETF) |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum | $10 | $1 (fractional shares) |
| Annual fee | ~1%+ | 0.12% |
| 2024 return | Mid-single digits | ~11% |
| Liquidity | Quarterly windows | Same-day |
| Correlation to stocks | Lower | Higher |
| Tax treatment | K-1 (some plans), 1099 | 1099-DIV |
| Volatility | Smoothed (internal valuations) | Real-time market pricing |
| Track record | Since 2012 | Since 2004 |
VNQ’s 2024 return of roughly 11% — with instant liquidity and a 0.12% fee — makes Fundrise’s mid-single-digit recovery look weak. But there’s a counterargument the Fundrise bulls make: volatility smoothing.
Because Fundrise uses internal valuations rather than daily market pricing, your account balance doesn’t swing 20% in a month. VNQ dropped 25% in early 2020 and has had multiple 15%+ drawdowns. Fundrise’s NAV barely flinched during COVID (though the underlying properties were certainly affected).
If you panic-sell during drawdowns, Fundrise’s illiquidity might actually protect you from yourself. That’s not a feature I’d pay 1% for, but I know people it’s helped.
Let’s say you invest $25,000 and hold for 10 years.
Fundrise scenario (7% gross, 1% fees = 6% net):
VNQ scenario (8% total return, 0.12% fee):
That’s nearly $9,000 more with VNQ. And you could access it whenever you wanted. The private real estate premium needs to be substantial to close that gap, and Fundrise’s actual track record doesn’t support it.
I’m being hard on them, so let me give credit where it’s earned.
The $10 minimum is genuine. Most private real estate requires $25,000-$100,000 accredited investor minimums. Fundrise opened this asset class to everyone. That matters.
The diversification is real. My money is spread across dozens of properties in multiple states. I couldn’t replicate that on my own without millions. If you’re comparing to tokenized real estate platforms where you’re picking individual properties, Fundrise handles diversification automatically.
The Fundrise IPO shares. They’ve been offering shares in Fundrise itself (the company, not the real estate) through Reg A+. If you believe in the platform long-term, this is interesting. My IPO shares are up about 15% on paper, though they’re even less liquid than the real estate funds.
The Innovation Fund. Their venture capital fund investing in tech and growth companies is a genuinely different offering from other real estate platforms. I haven’t invested in it, but the concept — using real estate crowdfunding infrastructure for venture access — is smart.
Redemption restrictions during downturns. The one time you most want liquidity is the one time you can’t get it. This isn’t a bug — it’s how private real estate works. But the marketing doesn’t emphasize it enough. New investors who put money in during 2021 expecting easy access were surprised.
Smoothed valuations obscure reality. When your account shows a gentle decline while public REITs are cratering, it feels reassuring. But those internal valuations can lag reality by months. The 2022-2023 losses might have been deeper than reported if properties were marked to market daily.
The fee structure is opaque at the fund level. The 1% headline is clear. The fund-level fees less so. Origination fees, disposition fees, and property-level management costs eat into returns before you see them.
You have $500-$10,000 and want private real estate exposure. This is Fundrise’s sweet spot. At this capital level, you can’t access institutional private real estate any other way. If you’re already investing in dividend stocks and public REITs and want diversification into private markets, a small Fundrise allocation makes sense.
You’re a long-term holder who won’t need the money for 5+ years. Fundrise performs best when you ignore it. The quarterly volatility doesn’t matter if your time horizon is a decade. (Though I’d argue VNQ in a Roth IRA has a similar outcome with better liquidity.)
You panic-sell during market drops. Seriously. If the 2020 crash or 2022 bear market caused you to sell stocks at the bottom, Fundrise’s illiquidity might be a feature for you.
If you need access to your money. Quarterly windows with possible restrictions is not liquidity. Put it in a high-yield savings account or VNQ instead.
If you’re fee-sensitive. The 1%+ annual drag is significant over time. At $10,000 invested, you’re paying $100+/year versus $12 for VNQ. Over 20 years, that difference compounds dramatically.
If you’re investing less than $500. The tax complexity and illiquidity aren’t worth it for tiny amounts. Fundrise will generate tax documents for your $10 investment. Just buy VNQ.
If you already own rental property. You’re already in real estate. Adding Fundrise concentrates your portfolio further. Better robo-advisors can give you diversified exposure with tax-loss harvesting thrown in.
I’m not adding more money. After 4+ years, my ~4% annualized return with quarterly liquidity doesn’t justify it when VNQ and SCHD exist. RealAI is interesting but doesn’t change the math.
I’m keeping my existing position because redemption timing is unpredictable and I’d rather let it compound than take the hit of exiting during a recovery. But new dollars go to my dividend and REIT portfolio in a taxable brokerage account where I control the liquidity.
If Fundrise’s 2026-2027 returns consistently beat public REITs by 2%+ (enough to justify the fee premium and illiquidity), I’ll reconsider. Until then, VNQ at 0.12% with same-day liquidity is the better deal for most people.
The RealAI data is fun to explore. But fun and profitable are different things.
Fundrise is a decent product in a world with better alternatives for most people. The $10 minimum and private market access are real advantages. The fees, illiquidity, and 2022-2023 performance are real disadvantages. RealAI is marketing wrapped in genuine data.
My money is voting with VNQ. Yours might land differently — and that’s fine, as long as you’re going in with the actual numbers, not the landing page.
Based on personal Fundrise account data from 2021-2026. Individual plan returns vary. This is not financial advice. Verify current fees, returns, and redemption terms on fundrise.com before investing.